Legal Opinion

Union Motor Car Co. v. Farmer

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1928No. 27090PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

This action was brought by the appellant as plaintiff in the court below, based upon a promissory note executed by the appellee, H. H. Farmer, for the balance of the purchase money of one Mercer car, or automobile, of the sport model pattern, No. 4296, purchased from the appellant. The action was instituted upon a writ of seizure based, upon a proper affidavit for the condemnation and sale of the automobile to satisfy the purchase-money lien. The declaration was filed March 34, 1920, and the writ of summons and seizure was issued to the sheriff of the county on April 6, 1920. The sheriff'…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Motor Car Co. v. CartledgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hyde Construction Co. v. Highway Materials Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Stringer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Natis v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kea v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  5. Kellogg v. StricklandMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API