Legal Opinion
McMichael v. McMichael
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 24, 2010No. 1090150 and 1090179Published
1Opinion of the Court
62 So.3d 465 (2010)
Ex parte Ronda McMICHAEL.
(In re Forney McMichael v. Ronda McMichael).
Ex parte Forney L. McMichael.
(In re Forney McMichael v. Ronda McMichael).
1090150 and 1090179.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
September 24, 2010.
Rehearing Denied November 19, 2010.
Arthur F. Fite III of The Fite Law Firm, L.L.C., Anniston; Steven D. Adcock, Talladega; and Susan P. Billeaud and M. Shane Lucado of Lucado Law Firm, LLC, Birmingham, for petitioner/respondent Ronda McMichael.
Christopher M. Hopkins of Campbell & Hopkins, Anniston, for petitioner/respondent Forney McMichael.
SMITH, Justice.
These…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Ex Parte Drill Parts & Service Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.