Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 11, 2017No. 16-6353UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

In this False Claims Act case, the jury returned a verdict in the government’s favor. Defendant moved for a new trial. The district court denied his motion, and he now challenges that denial. We affirm.

I

From January 1, 2007, to January 31, 2012, Dr. Philip Robinson submitted more than 25,000 claims to Medicare seeking reimbursement for optometry services he provided to nursing home patients. Medicare reimbursed more than $1.4 million for those claims. The government then sued Robinson under the False Claims Act, alleging that many of the claims were for medically…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of William R. Barney, J v. PNC Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Armisted v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Advance Sign Group, LLC v. Optec Displays, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Peter BolosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API