Legal Opinion

Kells v. Stupplebeen

Columbia County Court

Decided December 10, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInman, J.

An order was made in the above-entitled proceeding October 13, 1938, requiring Dayton Stupplebeen to pay fifteen dollars per month upon a judgment and denying the application of the judgment creditor to require Emma Haner to make payments thereon. Stupplebeen was required to make bis first payment on November 1, 1938. Thereafter a motion to modify on reargument was denied. A motion is now made to punish Stupplebeen for contempt for failure to pay the November first installment. Stupplebeen, by cross-motion, has again moved to modify the order.

Section 793 of the Civil Practice Act provides…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bergman v. BuechlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Schwartz Tire Corp. v. GershonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ZaroffCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  4. Reeves v. CrownshieldCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kaganowitz v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Sure Fire Fuel Corp. v. MartinezCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API