Legal Opinion
Barres v. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 17, 1977Published
1Opinion of the Court
74 N.J. 461 (1977)
378 A.2d 1148
ANTHONY BARRES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 25, 1977.
Decided October 17, 1977.
Mr. Barry H. Evenchick argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Walder, Steiner, Sondak & Evenchick, attorneys).
Ms. Jane M. Langseth argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys; Ms. Langseth, Mr. Clyde A. Szuch, and Mr. Armen Shahinian, on the brief).
2Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Beauharnais v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Gregoire v. G. P. Putnam's SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.