Legal Opinion
Austin Fireworks, Inc. v. T.H.E. Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 8, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-1341-FGTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(7) for failure to join a party under Fed.R.Civ.P. 19. Doc. 6. Plaintiff Austin Fireworks brings this action against its liability insurer, T.H.E. Insurance, seeking a declaration that its policy provides coverage for the injuries suffered by Craig Dehmlow allegedly caused by the detonation of a fireworks shell manufactured and sold by Austin Fireworks. Dehmlow claims to have been injured by an exploding fireworks shell while acting in the course of his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,208 Craig Dehmlow v. Austin FireworksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Heinson v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co. v. Reimer & Roger Assoc., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- United States Fire Insurance v. Milton Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Church Mutual Insurance v. Save-a-Buck Car Rental Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- Dannie L. Harvey, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Mark Whitaker, Deana MelchertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Healy-Petrik v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.