Legal Opinion

Friedlander v. Lehman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 14, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Twelftht District. Action by William Friedlander against Max Lehman. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Per curiam

Evidence that plaintiff paid out money for defendant, and between certain dates rendered services to defendant, which' plaintiff considers worth a certain sum of money, does not warrant a conclusion that defendant is under any liability. No request or-reasonable occasion for paying the money or rendering the service-being shown, no liability to the plaintiff exists. The affidavit upon-which the warrant was issued shows no facts from which it can be in- • ferred that any money is due plaintiff, no request or reasonable occasion to lay out the money or render the service specified being shown..

T…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martz v. CohenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API