Legal Opinion

Myles v. Wyatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1991No. 91-728PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator-appellant, James Myles, Jr., filed a “Motion for a Writ of Mandamus” in the Court of Appeals for Stark County on March 4, 1991. The court of appeals overruled the motion pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) (failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted) for lack of a proper complaint. We agree. R.C. 2731.04 states that “[application for the writ of mandamus must be by petition * * *.” Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thomas v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Simms v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Brantley v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Thomas v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Brantley v. GheeOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API