Russian Recovery Fund Limited v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Taxation of partnership; bona fide partnership; 26 U.S.C. § 704; 26 U.S.C. § 721; FPAA; economic substance; step transaction; Culbertson; penalties; reasonable reliance on tax advice
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (“TEFRA”) action seeking readjustment of partnership items involving what has come to be known as a “DAD” transaction. That is a distressed asset/debt (“DAD”) transaction in which losses suffered by .a tax indifferent entity are transferred to a partnership in exchange for an interest in that partnership, followed by the sale of that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- The Black & Decker Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jarnagin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Russian Recovery Fund Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Washington Mutual, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021