Legal Opinion

Russian Recovery Fund Limited v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 12, 2015No. 06-30T, 06-35TPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taxation of partnership; bona fide partnership; 26 U.S.C. § 704; 26 U.S.C. § 721; FPAA; economic substance; step transaction; Culbertson; penalties; reasonable reliance on tax advice

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (“TEFRA”) action seeking readjustment of partnership items involving what has come to be known as a “DAD” transaction. That is a distressed asset/debt (“DAD”) transaction in which losses suffered by .a tax indifferent entity are transferred to a partnership in exchange for an interest in that partnership, followed by the sale of that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. The Black & Decker Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  5. Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jarnagin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Russian Recovery Fund Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Washington Mutual, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API