Legal Opinion

Conservation Northwest v. Harris Sherman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2013No. 11-35729PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a district court may approve resolution of litigation involving a federal agency through a consent decree, which substantially and permanently amends regulations that the agency could only otherwise amend by complying with statutory rulemaking procedures. Conservation Northwest and a coalition of other environmental groups (“Plaintiffs”) sued the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), Forest Service, and Fish and Wildlife Service (collectively, the “Agencies”), challenging changes to the Survey and Manage Standard (“Survey and Manage” or the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. MuchnickSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund Board of Trustees v. Michael's Floor Covering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. State of North Dakota v. Regina McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. (HC) Borys v. ParamoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (HC) Harmless v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Torres v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API