Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rashad J. Smith v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 28, 2019No. 2017-KA-01494-COAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McCARTY, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:

¶42. Because I believe the record is sufficient at this point to resolve the question of whether there was ineffective assistance of counsel and does not require further exploration in the post-conviction process, I respectfully dissent in part. I agree with the majority's detailed conclusions regarding the sufficiency of the indictment and other issues in this case and therefore concur in part. Because the Supreme Court has made clear that the operative inquiry is whether there was a fair opportunity to present a defense and no unfair…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ivy v. HarringtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Sturgis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API