Rashad J. Smith v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
McCARTY, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:
¶42. Because I believe the record is sufficient at this point to resolve the question of whether there was ineffective assistance of counsel and does not require further exploration in the post-conviction process, I respectfully dissent in part. I agree with the majority's detailed conclusions regarding the sufficiency of the indictment and other issues in this case and therefore concur in part. Because the Supreme Court has made clear that the operative inquiry is whether there was a fair opportunity to present a defense and no unfair…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reed v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Ivy v. HarringtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
- Sturgis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.