Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Mundy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1919PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Emmet District Court. — 1ST. J. Lee, Judge. Action to rescind a written contract for the sale and exchange of land. Opinion states the facts. Decree for the plaintiff in the court below. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

On the 7th day of November, 1913, plaintiff and defendants entered into a written contract, by the terms of which the plaintiff agreed to purchase from the defendants certain land in Emmet County, consisting of 320 acres, for the sum of $32,000, to be paid for as follows: By delivering to the defendants a good and sufficient warranty deed to 160 acres in Aurora County, South Dakota, free and clear of all liens and incumbrances, except a first mortgage of $2,000, and by executing and delivering to the defendants a mortgage in the sum of $22,000 on the land purchased from the defendants, both…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mintle v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Boardman v. BubertIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Utemark v. SamuelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Kelley v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API