Myres' Case
New York Supreme Court
Application for the appointment of a receiver.
1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.
Proceedings supplementary to the execution have been taken in the case, and the examination having been completed, the plaintiffs now move for the appointment of a receiver. It is objected that it does not sufficiently appear that the defendant is entitled to any property which the receiver would be authorized to take.
It is well settled that the proceedings under this chapter are a substitute for a creditors’ bill, as recognized and well known under a former system of chancery practice, and are in their nature equitable proceedings. (Sale v. Lawson, 4 Sandf. R., 718).
The rules established…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bloodgood v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Browning v. BettisNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- Fitzburgh v. EveringhamNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dease v. ReeseNew York Supreme Court · 1903