Legal Opinion

Myres' Case

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for the appointment of a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.

Proceedings supplementary to the execution have been taken in the case, and the examination having been completed, the plaintiffs now move for the appointment of a receiver. It is objected that it does not sufficiently appear that the defendant is entitled to any property which the receiver would be authorized to take.

It is well settled that the proceedings under this chapter are a substitute for a creditors’ bill, as recognized and well known under a former system of chancery practice, and are in their nature equitable proceedings. (Sale v. Lawson, 4 Sandf. R., 718).

The rules established…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bloodgood v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  2. Browning v. BettisNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  3. Fitzburgh v. EveringhamNew York Court of Chancery · 1836

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dease v. ReeseNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API