Jett v. State

McMILLAN, Judge.

From an order and judgment revoking the appellant’s probation, this appeal follows. On appeal, appellant raises the following two issues: (1) In revoking appellant’s probation, did the trial court improperly consider a conviction without first establishing that the appellant was represented by counsel as required by Hollingsworth v. State, 410 So.2d 133 (Ala.Cr.App.1981), writ quashed, 410 So.2d 134 (Ala.1982)? and (2) Did the trial court fail to enter a “written statement” as required by Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975)? For the reasons outlined below,…