Howell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
joined by KELLER, P.J., and PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ.
During jury deliberations at Rachelle Howell’s trial, the jurors requested certain testimony be read to them. The judge asked if the jury was in disagreement, and they replied that one or more of them did not clearly hear the testimony. The judge found that this constituted a dispute under the relevant statute. We conclude that the judge did not abuse his discretion in reaching this conclusion, and the Court of Appeals erred in holding otherwise.
Facts
The State charged Howell with DWI. She pleaded not…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Robison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Iness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by185 opinions
- State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Coronel, Israel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.