Legal Opinion
Michele Reed McCoy v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 28, 2020No. 8:19-cv-00575Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELE REED MCCOY, Case No. 8:19-CV-00575-AB (JEMx) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 13 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE TRIAL DATE: JUNE 30, 2020 14 COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This case arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 18
29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”). Plaintiff Michele Reed McCoy (“Plaintiff”) 19 alleges that Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) improperly denied 20 her long term disability (“LTD”) benefits and seeks an order…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.