Hakkers v. Hansen

Plaintiff appeals from judgment entered on a jury verdict of no cause for action in his suit for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained when he was struck by an automobile operated and owned by defendants, respectively.

Chief factual dispute relates to point of impact and to what plaintiff had been doing just before he was struck. Plaintiff says that he had been stand ing along the left side and facing the front of his automobile, parked at the right curb, removing moisture from its windshield and side mirror, and that as he was moving back to open the door and to enter it he was…