Legal Opinion

Town of Cross v. De Roberts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1915No. 5261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Carrie M. De Roberts against the Town of Cross. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DUDLEY, C.

This is an action by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, to set aside funding bond proceedings and recover the amount due on certain warrants merged therein. We shall refer to the parties as they were in the lower court. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant brings the case here' for review. Since this appeal was taken, plaintiff died, and this case was revived in the name of his administratrix.

On November 17, 1894, the defendant, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Steinson v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. De Roberts v. Town of CrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Meredith Mechanic Ass'n v. American Twist Drill Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893
  5. De Roberts v. Town of CrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Centorp Corp. v. Gulf Production Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Bank of Chelsea v. School Dist. No. 1, Rogers Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API