Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Kirksey-Harrington
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 18, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-180 (BAH) (AK), Civil Action No. 13-2029 (BAH) (AK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
This consolidated case was randomly referred to a Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on the defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Def.’s Mot,”), ECF No. 23. See Order, ECF No. 21; Referral to Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 22.1 On July 31, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation, which recommended that the defendant’s motion be granted in part and1 denied in part. Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) at 16-17, ECF No. 27...
Specifically, the R & R recommended excluding certain charges…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Snead Ex Rel. C.S. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Platt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Wilhite v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Taylor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lather, Inc. v. Gilchrist and Soames, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.