Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Bah Shoney's Corp.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided April 11, 2017No. Case No. 3:16-cv-03016PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ALETA A. TRAUGER, United States District Judge

Before the court is the Motion to Compel Arbitration- and to Stay All Proceedings (Doc. No. 12) filed by defendant BAH Shoney’s Corp.1 (“BAH” or “defendant”). Plaintiff Tamika Hudson has filed a Response opposing the motion (Doc. No. 22), along with a supporting Memorandum (Doc. No. 23) and Corrected Affidavit (Doc. No. 27). The defendant filed a Reply (Doc. No. 24). For the reasons set forth herein, the defendant’s motion will be denied.

I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Tamika Hudson was hired on May 31, 2014 as a cashier at…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sevier Cnty. Schs. Fed. Credit Union v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Byars v. Dart Transit CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API