Manzano v. Kansas Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1DissentPowell, J.
Israel Manzano, prior to his de novo judicial review hearing in the district court, stipulated in his diversion agreement with the prosecutor of his DUI criminal case that he “operated the motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and as a result of the influence of alcohol, [he] . . . was incapable of safely operating the motor vehicle.” After he was read his Miranda rights by law enforcement and then asked if he understood those rights, he replied, “Fuck you.” A couple of minutes later, after law enforcement read him the implied consent warnings, he was asked if he would provide a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Hamlin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Bureau of Traffic Safety v. QuinlanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.