Legal Opinion

Hannah v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1972No. 46916, 46917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

The lethal character of the weapon used in making an assault may be inferred from the nature of the weapon and effect of the wound inflicted. Nelson v. State, 4 Ga. App. 223 (60 SE 1072); Hardy v. State, 24 Ga. App. 141 (100 SE 20); Jackson v. State, 56 Ga. App. 374 (1) (192 SE 633); Wells v. State, 125 Ga. App. 579. It may also be inferred from the circumstances under which the weapon is used. It appears here, as to the pistol, that James Hannah left the restaurant and returned almost immediately with it, pointing it at Goforth, and stating he was going to kill him. Absence of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Maughon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Pidcock v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Purvis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Garrett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API