Mintz v. . Russ
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Bragam, J., at September Special Term, 1912, of BbuNswicK. Action of ejectment. At close of plaintiff’s evidence, on motion, there was judgment of nonsuit, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
Plaintiff introduced a deed from McDowell Russ to Dexter Russ, dated 17 January, 1876, registered March, 1910; a deed or binding contract covering same land from Dexter Russ to plaintiff, dated in 1880, registered October, 1907. Plaintiff further introduced deed from McDowell Russ to defendant, dated January, 1905, registered February, 1908, and, as we understand the record, the evidence on the part of plaintiff tends to show that the locus in quo lies on the east of the Fork and Starboard Road and same is included within the lines of plaintiff’s deed; that plaintiff’s house is on this land,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Combes v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Simmons v. Defiance Box Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Houston v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lanier v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Price v. Tomrich CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Shelly v. . GraingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Shelly v. GraingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Lanier v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.