Legal Opinion
George v. Depierris
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 15, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Seventh District Court in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The action was brought to recover the value of a trunk and contents which the plaintiff claimed was lost through ’ the negligence of the defendant, the proprietor of the Hotel Bayard, in this city. ,
It appears that in May, 1895, Mr. and -Mrs. Schonthal (who subsequently employed the plaintiff), came .to' the hotel and engaged rooms for themselves,.child and maid-servant. During.their ■ stay they changed servants, and on October 30, 1895, the plaintiff *401was engaged as maid and seamstress. She was assigned to a room; ate at the table of the hotel with other persons similarly employed by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wintermute v. ClarkThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
- Coykendall v. EatonNew York Supreme Court · 1869
- Smith v. ReadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
- Bouton v. BoutonNew York Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by2 opinions
- McKillop v. ReichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- McKillop v. ReichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902