Legal Opinion

Martin v. Bryson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Nolan. Tried below before Hon. H. C. Hord, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Associate Justice.

This is an action of trespass to try-title brought by appellant, Martin, against the appellee, Bryson, to recover title and possession of section 282, Houston & Texas Central Railway Company school land, lying in Nolan County. The appellee pleaded not guilty and, in effect, that appellant's claim of title was based on certain execution sales which were void for the reason that the land, being unpatented school land, was not subject to execution; and by reason of certain alleged irregularities in the sale made by the sheriff whereby the land sold for a grossly…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. De Shazo v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Harwell v. HarbisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Sox v. MiracleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Antone v. Kurth Lumber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. De Shazo v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API