People v. Rahim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*971The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he had been deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial. Pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a), the People were required to be ready for trial within six months of the commencement of this criminal action, in which a felony was charged (see People v Goss, 87 NY2d 792, 796 [1996]; People v Smith, 88 AD3d 749 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 955 [2011]). In this case, the six-month period consisted of 181 days. The People conceded that 90 days of delay were chargeable to them. At…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. GossNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. ChavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. WearenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. TitusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. OcasioNew York Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.