Legal Opinion

Stahl v. United States Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 6, 2003No. 02-2915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

The appellants entered into agreements with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) whereby the USDA agreed to write-down a portion of their debt in exchange for part of the appreciation in the value of their farms or ranches during the term of the agreement. Appellants initiated this declaratory judgment action, arguing that their obligation to pay ended with the term of the agreement and challenging the USDA’s determination of the maximum amount collectible under the agreements. The district court 1 granted the USDA’s motion to dismiss. We affirm.

I

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stahl v. United States Department Of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Armstrong v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  3. Indian Land Capital Company, LLC v. Infrastructure Development Cooperative, LCADistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
  4. Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API