Legal Opinion · Dissent

McWane Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1945No. 30621, 30622Published

1DissentMacIntyre, J.

Unquestionably, if the contract of indorsement could be shown to be an accommodation indorsement and it could be shown by parol evidence that there was no consideration therefor, the legal evidence in this case authorized the verdict for the defendant, the accommodation indorser. “Parol evidence shall be admissible to show that the writing was either originally void or subsequently became so.” Code, § 38-503. I think that all the other evidence, both written and oral, when considered in connection with the note sued on, would have authorized a finding by the jury that the defendant, when he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. . HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Second National Bank v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Dean v. LydeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Kennedy v. HeymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Jewell v. NorrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API