Legal Opinion

Dodenhoff v. Nilson Motor Express Lines

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 24, 1939No. 14848PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

The record in this case consists of the pleadings, the charge of the presiding Judge, and the exceptions. All exceptions are to the charge of the trial Judge.

Exception 1 alleges error in that the trial Judge in his statement of the law regarding the required lights on certain trucks, stated: “For instance, it says that between the hours of half an hour after sundown and until half an hour before sunrise you must drive with lights on your car or truck. When it comes to- a truck they must have extra lights about the top and the back,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Southern Railway, Carolina Div.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Horne v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Keel v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  4. Mercer v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Moore v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Field v. GREGORYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Myers v. EVANSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. Williams v. Southeastern Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. Shockley v. Cox Circus Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  5. PEE DEE PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOC. v. JoyeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API