Legal Opinion · Dissent

Law Firm of Paul L. Erickson, P.A. v. Boykin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 2007No. 4262Published

1DissentGoolsby, J.

I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment below, principally because the trial judge placed the burden of proof upon the wrong party. The judgment debtors bore that burden in this instance, not the judgment creditor, and the judgment debtors failed to carry that burden.

The appellant Law Firm of Paul L. Erickson, P.A., filed with the clerk of court of Horry County pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 15-35-920(A) (2005)4 a properly authenticated copy of a North Carolina judgment it obtained against the respondents James R. Boykin and Mona S. Boykin, two South Carolina residents; on August…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. IveyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Lust v. Fountain of Life, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Security Credit Leasing, Inc. v. ArmalyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Coskery v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API