Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas Chisholm Bartsh

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1993No. 92-1470PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant’s petition for rehearing is granted in part. We adhere to our prior opinion in all respects except on the issue of the amount of restitution. Since the record is not clear on how much restitution was made to the government (in money or assets) before the restitution order was entered, the matter is remanded for the limited purpose of determining the amount of restitution paid, which should then be credited towards the restitution obligation.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas Chisholm BartshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Harry C. Swiontek v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas Chisolm BartshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Jeremy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017