Legal Opinion
Freedman v. Overseas Scientific Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiff, Hyman Freedman, seeks an accounting for profits and damages from the defendants, Overseas Scientific Corporation and G. George Field, its President, individually, for infringement of plaintiff’s Patent No. 2,149,048 granted February 28,1939.
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff is the owner of Patent No. 2,149,048, dated February 28, 1939, for an “Artificial Dental Structure”.
2. The patent, insofar as it is in issue in this case, covers a pair of artificial dentures, upper and lower, made at least partially of a magnetized material so positioned…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Joseph A. Weiss v. Emerich HunnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Schempp v. School District of Abington Township, PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Johnson v. ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- Bankers Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- In Re Food Management Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.