Legal Opinion

Capps v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant sued to recover the sum of $450, alleged balance due for boring a well, alleging that he had entered into a contract with appellee to bore a well, for which he was to pay the sum of $2 per foot for the first 100 feet, $2.50 per foot for the second 100 feet, and $3 per foot for the third 100 feet; that it was agreed that, if the water in the well was insufficient to support a pump, and to justify the pumping of same for irrigation purposes, then, and in such event, appellee was only to pay the sum of $1 per foot; that appellee agreed to promptly and properly make a test of said well…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. San Bernardino Valley Water Development Co. v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Capps v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API