The Wing on Bank Limited of Hong Kong v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Fort Lauderdale
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
A careful review of the evidence submitted to the Court below, sitting as trier of the facts, convinces us that his findings of fact and conclusions of law hereto appended are correct so far as they go.
But as Wing On points out they are deficient in not treating expressly with the failure of American National to notify Wing On of the defects in the documents of the letter of credit papers required. 1 However, even if the defendant failed to satisfy that obligation here, the record reveals that Wing On failed to establish that it was prejudiced by the delay. The merchandise was not shipped on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
3Cited by9 opinions
- Heritage Bank v. Redcom Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Philadelphia Gear Corporation v. Central BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Flagship Cruises, Ltd. v. New England Merchants National Bank of Boston, and Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Siderius, Inc. v. Wallace Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- LaBarge Pipe & Steel Co. v. First BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.