Pontious v. Durflinger
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
— In this action, the appellant, as plaintiff, sued, the appellee, as defendant, in the court below.
In his complaint, the appellant alleged, in substance,, that, on the 22d day of June, 1874, oue John H. Butler executed and delivered to McBurgess & Durflinger, a firm composed of Hugh McBurgess and the appellee, John W. Durflinger, his note for $200.00, due in six months from its date; that, on the 19th day of August, 1874, said McBurgess assigned to the appellee all his interest in said note, by a written endorsement thereon; that afterward, for a valuable consideration, the appellee endorsed…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Robbins v. MageeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bailey v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Shinkle v. ShearmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893