Legal Opinion

Alden v. . Earle

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior' Court of the city of New York, made January 7,1889, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a. verdict directed by the court, and granted a new trial. This action was brought by plaintiffs, real estate brokers, to. recover commissions for renting certain premises belonging to-defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior' Court of the city of New York, made January 7,1889, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a. verdict directed by the court, and granted a new trial. This action was brought by plaintiffs, real estate brokers, to. recover commissions for renting certain premises belonging to-defendant. After discussing the evidence, the court here say r “We think the facts bring the case within the rule declared in Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Co. (83 N. Y. 381). There is. no pretence of bad faith on the part of the defendant. The…

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, J.,

reads for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute on stipulation against plaintiffs.

All concur.

Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frink v. GilbertWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bennett v. EganThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  3. Bennett v. EganThe Superior Court of New York City · 1893
  4. Clarkson v. HowardThe Superior Court of New York City · 1892
  5. Clarkson v. HowardThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API