Legal Opinion

Barnett v. The Kroger Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 5, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00544Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TASHEBA BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:22-cv-544 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE THE KROGER COMPANY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This case seeks to impose liability on Defendants The Kroger Company, Fred Meyer, Inc., Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., and Harris Teeter, LLC (the Grocery Stores) for their involvement in selling “Simple Truth Organic Rice Rusks Baby Teething Wafers” (the Product), which Plaintiffs allege contain elevated levels of toxic metals. But the case is experiencing some teething pains of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Christopher J. Weiland v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Smith v. Bayer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API