Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. . Bank of Commerce

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] If the plaintiffs had, as they have alleged in the complaint, purchased of the defendant the notes which the latter held against R. G.L. Schuyler, both parties to the contract understanding at the time that, although the makers were insolvent, the notes were secured by the hypothecation of three hundred and seventy shares of New…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheadon v. OldsNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Markle v. HatfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  3. Horton v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Burr v. VeederNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  5. Defreeze v. TrumperNew York Supreme Court · 1806

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Strubbe v. SonnenscheinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Strubbe v. SonnenscheinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Marsh v. Oneida Central BankNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API