Legal Opinion
Roth v. State University
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 14, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland G. DeGrasse, J.), entered November 30, 2007, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The summons described the nature of this action as “violations of federal, New York State, and New York City human rights laws, including but not limited to” various named statutes. Since numerous potential causes of action may be brought under these statutes, the summons left defendants to guess the precise claims against them (see Scaringi v Broome Realty Corp., 191 AD2d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scaringi v. Elizabeth Broome Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Wells v. Mount Sinai Hospital and Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016
- Ace Sec. Corp. v. DB Structured Prods., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016
- David A. Kaminsky & Assoc., PC v. BrennerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- David Condrington v. Raymours Furniture Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Murillo-Roman v. The Pension Boards-United Church of Christ, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.