Legal Opinion

Miller v. Haley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1931No. Civil No. 3017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Earl J. Haley, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against George W. Miller and Charles C. Miller, Jr., copartners under the firm name of Miller Brothers Motors, hereinafter called defendants, to recover possession of a certain automobile, or for the sum of $500, the alleged value of the property, and for $200 damages for its wrongful detention.

Defendants answered with a general denial, and the matter was tried before a jury, which found in favor of plaintiff and assessed the value of the automobile at $360, and the damages for its detention at $350. Plaintiff, in open court remitted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shepard v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hughes v. the Riggs BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Commercial Securities Corp. Consolidated v. Babbitt Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Davis, Gould & Co. v. Danforth & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Company v. LomaxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Monaghan v. BarnesArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Rosenzweig & Sons, Jewelers, Inc. v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Bianconi v. LyallArizona Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API