Legal Opinion

Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Pomeroy Real Estate Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment modified in accordance with memorandum, with costs, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to defendant, in accordance with the following memorandum: The trial court erred in denying defendant’s application for an extra allowance of 5% as permitted by subdivision 2 of section 16 of the Condemnation Law (subject matter now at EDPL 701) based upon its finding that the case was neither difficult nor extraordinary. The allowance is authorized to permit an owner to be reimbursed for the expenses which he has incurred in establishing value and to receive full indemnity for his property…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dodge v. TierneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the New York Transit AuhorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Town of Esopus v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Saratoga County Sewer District 1 v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API