Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 9, 1988No. 87-547PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to consider whether the defendant's Batson1 objection was timely. The Court of Criminal Appeals, holding that it was, remanded the case for further proceedings. See Bell v. State,535 So.2d 208 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987). The record clearly shows, however, that the defendant's objection to the venire was made after the jury had been empaneled and sworn. The record reveals the following:

"The Court: Ladies and gentlemen, I understand it's late in the day. What I propose to do is we're going to get a jury selected, put a jury in the box, and then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Levert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Leonard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Acres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API