Legal Opinion
Cadle Company v. Schlichtmann
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 31, 2003No. 02-2709PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.
The Cadle Company, one of the plaintiffs, is trying to enforce a note against the defendants. Jan R. Schlichtmann, one of the defendants, however, purchased Ca-dle’s cause of action against the defendants at a sheriffs sale in Texas. Cadle then claimed that it was merely acting as agent for a limited partnership, Atlanta Joint Venture, and that Atlanta still had an enforceable ninety-nine per cent, interest in the cause of action. Atlanta attempted to intervene, but the District Court denied Atlanta’s motion as untimely and concluded that Cadle’s prior…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beddall v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Mangual v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Public Service v. NH Consumer AdvocateCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Gulf of Maine Fishermen's Alliance v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HappCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Cadle Co. v. SchlichtmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Candelario-Del-Moral v. UBS Financial Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- In Re SchlichtmannUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.