Schmidt v. Briarcliff Lodge Ass'n
City of New York Municipal Court
Action by Joseph J. Schmidt against the Briarcliff Dodge Association. On motion to amend judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.
This is a motion made by defendant why the judgment entered herein on the 23d day of April, 1914, should not be amended by striking out therefrom the sum of $42.32, interest upon the amount of the recovery. It appears from the facts herein that the plaintiff instituted an action against defendant to recover the sum of $796 for the fair and reasonable value of the services performed for the benefit of the defendant in the preparation of certain blueprints, claiming that the fair and reasonable value for each blueprint was the sum of $1. Defendant, by its answer, admitted that the only service…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Excelsior Terra Cotta Co. v. . HardeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Delafield v. Village of WestfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Excelsior Terra Cotta Co. v. HardeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Markham v. David Stevenson Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Chambers v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.