Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Fincher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1999No. A99A1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Chief Judge.

The central issue in this case is whether an arbitration provision contained in a builder’s warranty is enforceable. We find that the provision is enforceable and therefore affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the builder.

In March 1995, William and Annie Haynes contracted to buy a house to be built by Donald Fincher. Among other things, the contract provided that a builder’s warranty from the Residential Warranty Corporation would be delivered to the Hayneses at the closing of the sale of the house. Fincher built the house, and the closing was held in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Primerica Financial Services, Inc. v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Longino v. Bank of EllijayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Tigner v. Shearson-Lehman Hutton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Weyant v. MacIntyreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Collins v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Order Homes, LLC v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Wise v. Tidal Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Helms v. Franklin Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Bryan County v. Yates Paving & Grading Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Ghertner v. SolaimaniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API