Legal Opinion
Ansalve v. Tucker
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1993No. 92-CA-0740PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Judge.
Plaintiff, Michael Ansalve challenges the validity of a default judgment rendered in his favor against defendants, Ruben Tucker and Allstate Insurance Company in the amount of $1,649.55 plus interest and costs. Plaintiff also challenges the adequacy of the quantum of the award. For the reasons herein given, we affirm the judgment of the trial court as it relates to Allstate Insurance Company and reverse the judgment of the trial court as it relates to Ruben Tucker.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On September 20, 1991, the plaintiff, Michael Ansalve filed an action for damages against Ruben…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Reck v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Clay v. ClaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Coleman v. Douglas Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Glessner v. HyattLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitchell v. BassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- In the Interest of Edwards v. MathieuLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ansalve v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999