Legal Opinion

In re Brett & In re McCool

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 14, 2014No. 2012-094 & 2012-236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. Petitioners in these consolidated appeals, both recipients of home-based long-term care benefits through Vermont’s Medicaid-funded Choices for Care (Choices) program, appeal decisions of the Human Services Board disallowing deduc tions for personal care services from their patient-share obligation under federal and state Medicaid laws. We conclude that, to the extent the services in question are medically necessary, expenses for those services must be deducted from petitioners’ patient-share obligation even if they are of a type generally covered by Medicaid. We further reject the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Petition of DA AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Passion v. Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Ploof v. Village of Enosburg FallsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. In Re BrettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leo P. Pratt, III v. Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. In re Investigation to Review the Avoided Costs that Serve as Prices for the Standard-Offer Program in 2020 (Allco Renewable Energy Limited & PLH LLC, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API