Legal Opinion

People v. Hinkley

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1963No. Crim. No. 1618PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

In July 1961, the defendant was charged with, tried by a jury for, and convicted of the offense of receiving stolen property, a violation of section 496 of the Penal Code. He applied for and obtained probation by an order dated August 22, 1961. The term of probation was five years. Imposing of sentence was suspended accordingly. The conditions of probation, among others, were confinement in a county detention facility for six months, and payment of a $500 fine. He did not move for a new trial, nor appeal from *473the order placing him on probation (Pen. Code, §1237), by which, if desired, he…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. TuthillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. LumbleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. GlaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API