Legal Opinion

Golden Spike Equipment Co. v. Croshaw

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1965No. 10266PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Defendant-buyer seeks reversal of a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-seller holding ■defendant liable on a past due installment payment under a conditional sales contract, and urges that we declare the entire con■tract unenforceable.

Plaintiff, a farm equipment dealer in Tremonton, Utah, sold defendant a used 1957 combine-harvester on July 30, 1963, under a conditional sales contract providing for a cash price of $2,500, plus a time price differential1 (the permissible additional charge for time payments) of $124.61. The down payment was a credit of $700, leaving a balance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Soter v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Utah Resources International, Inc. v. Mark Technologies Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API