Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Department of Transportation Ex Rel. People v. Central Stone Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 2, 1990No. 4-89-0939Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE GREEN,

specially concurring:

I concur in the decision of the majority to reverse and remand for a new trial because of error in the admission of the testimony of the witness, Newman. However, I deem the issues raised by that testimony to be closer than does the majority. I question whether error in the refusal to strike the testimony can be sufficiently explained by describing the testimony as valuing only the limestone reserves rather than the land as a whole.

Certainly, Newman did not “appraise separately the mineral deposit and add its value to the value of the land without the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. AnthonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Department of Transportation v. Quincy Coach House, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Department of Transportation v. MullenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API